Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSUE DURAN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01605-JLT-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 11 TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY 12 DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL 13 | LLC, PROCEDURE 14 Defendant. (ECF No. 25) 15 16 On August 29, 2023, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 25.) In light of the stipulation of the 18 | parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 19 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 20 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Af | Dated: _ August 30, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.