Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 24, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-01605·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOSUE DURAN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01605-JLT-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 17) 14 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 22 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 23 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 24 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 25 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 26 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 27 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 28 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 1 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 2 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 3 information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 4 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under 5 seal. 6 2. DEFINITIONS 7 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 8 information or items under this Order. 9 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 10 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 11 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 12 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 13 well as their support staff). 14 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 15 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL”. 16 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 17 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 18 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 19 responses to discovery in this matter. 20 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 21 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 22 consultant in this action. 23 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 24 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 25 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 26 entity not named as a Party to this action. 27 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 28 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 1 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 3 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 4 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 5 Material in this action. 6 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 7 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 8 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 9 subcontractors. 10 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 11 “CONFIDENTIAL”. 12 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 13 Producing Party. 14 3. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 16 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 17 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 18 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 19 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 20 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 21 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 22 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 23 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 24 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 25 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 26 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 27 4. DURATION 28 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 1 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 2 order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 3 claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 4 the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 5 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 6 applicable law. 7 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 8 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 9 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 10 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 11 The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, 12 items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, 13 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 14 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 15 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 16 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 17 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 18 expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 19 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 20 for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other 21 Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 22 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order 23 (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 24 Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 25 designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 26 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 27 (a) For information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding 28 transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the 1 legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (Duran v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)