Duran v. Duran

208 So. 3d 291, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18692
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 2016·No. No. 3D16-823·Published

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

The former wife seeks review of the trial court’s amended final judgment of injunction against domestic violence in favor of the former husband. After a careful review of the testimony in the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment below. “The trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court’s decision.” Jackson v. Echols, 937 So.2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duran v. Duran, 208 So. 3d 291, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

208 So. 3d 291 (Duran v. Duran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Echols
937 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)