Duran v. Duran
This text of Duran v. Duran (Duran v. Duran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 21, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D16-823 Lower Tribunal No. 16-5845 ________________
Katia Maria Duran, Appellant,
vs.
Ramon Jose Duran, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C. Figarola, Judge.
A. Antonio Tomas, for appellant.
Harvey D. Rogers, for appellee.
Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
LOGUE, J.
The former wife seeks review of the trial court’s amended final judgment of
injunction against domestic violence in favor of the former husband. After a
careful review of the testimony in the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment below. “The trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting,
denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of
discretion is demonstrated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court’s
decision.” Jackson v. Echols, 937 So. 2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Duran v. Duran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duran-v-duran-fladistctapp-2016.