Duran v. Duran

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 2016·No. 16-0823·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 21, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-823 Lower Tribunal No. 16-5845 ________________

Katia Maria Duran, Appellant,

vs.

Ramon Jose Duran, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C. Figarola, Judge.

A. Antonio Tomas, for appellant.

Harvey D. Rogers, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The former wife seeks review of the trial court’s amended final judgment of

injunction against domestic violence in favor of the former husband. After a

careful review of the testimony in the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment below. “The trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting,

denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of

discretion is demonstrated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court’s

decision.” Jackson v. Echols, 937 So. 2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duran v. Duran, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Duran v. Duran (Duran v. Duran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Echols
937 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)