Dupre v. Chase
This text of 46 F. App'x 473 (Dupre v. Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Dupre appeals the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the Montana State Parole Board’s denial of parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see Alvarado v. Hill, 252 F.3d 1066, 1068 (9th Cir.2001), and we agree with the parties that he exhausted his federal claims by presenting them to the Montana State Supreme Court. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.1
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupre-v-chase-ca9-2002.