Duperier v. State
568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7723, 1990 WL 149751
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1990·No. No. 89-1306·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. The appellant moved to suppress physical evidence prior to trial, but he failed to object when it was introduced at trial. Thus, he has waived his right to appellate review. Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Deluca v. State, 384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). For a comprehensive discussion of this issue, see Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927).
[977]*977We find no error in the remaining points raised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duperier v. State, 568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7723, 1990 WL 149751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
568 So. 2d 976 (Duperier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. State
851 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Fripp v. State
766 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Jaggers v. State
588 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)