Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Duperier v. State

Duperier v. State

568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7723, 1990 WL 149751
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1306
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 568 So. 2d 976 (Duperier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duperier v. State, 568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7723, 1990 WL 149751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. The appellant moved to suppress physical evidence prior to trial, but he failed to object when it was introduced at trial. Thus, he has waived his right to appellate review. Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Deluca v. State, 384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). For a comprehensive discussion of this issue, see Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927).

[977]*977We find no error in the remaining points raised.

LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez v. State
851 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Fripp v. State
766 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Jaggers v. State
588 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7723, 1990 WL 149751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duperier-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.