Baglio v. State
This text of 467 So. 2d 1030 (Baglio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Peter BAGLIO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for sexual battery. The primary error asserted is the denial of a motion to suppress the physical evidence obtained as a result of appellant's allegedly unlawful arrest. Defendant's motion to suppress was denied prior to trial. During trial, however, the physical evidence was admitted. Defense counsel not only failed to object but specifically stated that he had no objection to the admission of same. Accordingly, the right to appellate review of the issue has been waived. DeLuca v. State, 384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
DOWNEY, HURLEY, and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 So. 2d 1030, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baglio-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.