Dunlap v. THE MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND

2011 OK 14, 249 P.3d 951, 2011 Okla. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 704514
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 1, 2011
Docket107,353
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 2011 OK 14 (Dunlap v. THE MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunlap v. THE MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND, 2011 OK 14, 249 P.3d 951, 2011 Okla. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 704514 (Okla. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

T1 Certiorari is granted for the limited purpose of reviewing the applicability of the *952 "any competent evidence" standard of review in deciding this case. The Court of Civil Appeals decided this case on November 10, 2010, and applied the "any competent evidence" standard of review. Prior to the Court of Appeals decision, an amendment to 85 0.8. 8.6(C) took effect on November 1, 2010, that abrogated the "any competent evidence" standard of review. The amendment authorized review of an order or award to determine whether it was against the clear weight of the evidence. See 85 O.S. Supp. 2010 3.6(C). The amendment notwithstanding, the Court of Civil Appeals properly applied the "any competent evidence" standard of review in deciding this case because the injury underlying the claim for benefits occurred prior to effective date of the amendment. Knott v. Halliburton, 1988 OK 29, ¶ 4, 752 P.2d 812, 813-14. The amendment authorizing review of an order or award to determine whether it was against the clear weight of the evidence applies prospectively to claims for injuries that occur after the effective date of the amendment. 12 The Court of Civil Appeals opinion is otherwise undisturbed.

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011.

¶ 3 ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
2015 OK 8 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2015)
WELDON v. FLEX-N-GATE, OKLAHOMA, LLC
2015 OK CIV APP 14 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2014)
Joe Brown Co. v. Melton
2013 OK 66 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2013)
Intermedix Corp. v. Wolf
2013 OK CIV APP 82 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2013)
Westoak Industries, Inc. v. DeLeon
2013 OK CIV APP 32 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2013)
Controls Components, Ltd. v. Weaver
2013 OK 8 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2013)
Prince v. Brake Rebuilders & Friction Products, Inc.
2012 OK 104 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
Williams Companies v. Dunkelgod
2012 OK 96 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
Harvey v. Auto Plus of Woodward
2012 OK CIV APP 92 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2012)
Yzer, Inc. v. Rodr
2012 OK 50 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
NOMAC DRILLING LLC v. Mowdy
2012 OK 45 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
CURWOOD, INC. v. Camp
2011 OK CIV APP 114 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2011)
City of Midwest City v. Maddux
2011 OK CIV APP 95 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2011)
AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY v. Corley
2011 OK CIV APP 110 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 OK 14, 249 P.3d 951, 2011 Okla. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 704514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-the-multiple-injury-trust-fund-okla-2011.