Dunlap v. THE MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND
This text of 2011 OK 14 (Dunlap v. THE MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
T1 Certiorari is granted for the limited purpose of reviewing the applicability of the *952 "any competent evidence" standard of review in deciding this case. The Court of Civil Appeals decided this case on November 10, 2010, and applied the "any competent evidence" standard of review. Prior to the Court of Appeals decision, an amendment to 85 0.8. 8.6(C) took effect on November 1, 2010, that abrogated the "any competent evidence" standard of review. The amendment authorized review of an order or award to determine whether it was against the clear weight of the evidence. See 85 O.S. Supp. 2010 3.6(C). The amendment notwithstanding, the Court of Civil Appeals properly applied the "any competent evidence" standard of review in deciding this case because the injury underlying the claim for benefits occurred prior to effective date of the amendment. Knott v. Halliburton, 1988 OK 29, ¶ 4, 752 P.2d 812, 813-14. The amendment authorizing review of an order or award to determine whether it was against the clear weight of the evidence applies prospectively to claims for injuries that occur after the effective date of the amendment. 12 The Court of Civil Appeals opinion is otherwise undisturbed.
DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 OK 14, 249 P.3d 951, 2011 Okla. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 704514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-the-multiple-injury-trust-fund-okla-2011.