Dunklee v. Locke
This text of 13 Mass. 525 (Dunklee v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statute of 1810, c. 84, which directs the setting off one execution against another, where the creditor in one is the debtor in the other, expressly provides that the direction shall not affect or discharge the lien which any attorney may have upon any judgments or executions for his fees or disbursements. This amounts, *at least, to a legislative declaration that such lien may exist.» In the case brought before us by this writ of error, such a lien existed, and, being duly made known to the officer holding the executions, he was bound to recognize it. He acted correctly in refusing to set off the costs. The judgment of the Common Pleas was, therefore, erroneous, and must be reversed. a
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Mass. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunklee-v-locke-mass-1816.