Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc.

250 A.D. 829, 296 N.Y.S. 456, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9184

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 829 (Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc., 250 A.D. 829, 296 N.Y.S. 456, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon reargument and submission of the appeal on the amended record, order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and summary judgment granted in favor of the plaintiffs for the reUef demanded in the complaint on the grounds stated in memorandum filed with decision of November 11, 1936 [249 App. Div. 709], and on the additional ground that we deem the effect of the recent deeds executed by the three children of Alexander A. MeFarlan questionable. All concur. (The order denies motion to strike out amended answer and for summary judgment in an action to recover purchase price of a house purchased on a contract.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ. [See 248 App. Div. 942.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon reargument and submission of the appeal on the amended record, order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and summary judgment granted in favor of the plaintiffs for the reUef demanded in the complaint on the grounds stated in memorandum filed with decision of November 11, 1936 [249 App. Div. 709], and on the additional ground that we deem the effect of the recent deeds executed by the three children of Alexander A. MeFarlan questionable. All concur. (The order denies motion to strike out amended answer and for summary judgment in an action to recover purchase price of a house purchased on a contract.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ. [See 248 App. Div. 942.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 829, 296 N.Y.S. 456, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunkel-v-homindustries-inc-nyappdiv-1937.