Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc.

248 A.D. 942, 291 N.Y.S. 186, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139

This text of 248 A.D. 942 (Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunkel v. Homindustries, Inc., 248 A.D. 942, 291 N.Y.S. 186, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: In affirming this order we are not called upon to determine what the construction of this will should be further than to say that we find questions of fact under both claims, that respecting the easements and that respecting the construction of the will. All concur. (The order denies motion to strike out amended answer and for summary judgment in an action to recover purchase price of a house purchased on a contract.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 942, 291 N.Y.S. 186, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunkel-v-homindustries-inc-nyappdiv-1936.