Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. State
265 A.D. 1037
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1943
DocketClaim No. 25371
StatusPublished
This text of 265 A.D. 1037 (Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. State, 265 A.D. 1037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
All concur, except Dowling and MeCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment is for claimant on a claim against the State under a construction contract.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-sullivan-dredging-co-v-state-nyappdiv-1943.