Dunagan v. State
This text of 667 S.E.2d 446 (Dunagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Dunagan v. State, 283 Ga. 501 (661 SE2d 525) (2008), the Supreme Court reversed Division 2 of this court’s opinion in Dunagan v. State, 286 Ga. App. 668, 670 (2) (649 SE2d 765) (2007). The Supreme Court held that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the State’s motion in limine to exclude Dunagan’s evidence that the intersection was inherently dangerous, and remanded to this court for further consideration.
Because evidence that the intersection was inherently dangerous was Dunagan’s sole defense in refuting evidence of his criminal negligence, its exclusion was harmful error. See Gibson v. State, 280 Ga. App. 435, 436 (1) (634 SE2d 204) (2006) (homicide by vehicle conviction reversed and remanded because trial counsel failed to introduce evidence of intersection signal malfunctions); Johnson v. State, 246 Ga. App. 239, 242 (5) (539 SE2d 914) (2000) (exclusion of evidence regarding sole defense was harmful error).
Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, Dunagan’s conviction is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Judgment reversed and case remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 S.E.2d 446, 293 Ga. App. 600, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3124, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunagan-v-state-gactapp-2008.