Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Dumas v. State

Dumas v. State

651 So. 2d 699, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 312, 1995 WL 18390
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1686
StatusPublished

This text of 651 So. 2d 699 (Dumas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dumas v. State, 651 So. 2d 699, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 312, 1995 WL 18390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinions

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. Because it was a departure from the sentencing guidelines and no reason was given for the departure, we vacate the sentence. State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). The requirement to pay money to “First Step” is error. Fyler v. State, 645 So.2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); McLeod v. State, 645 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 [700]*700So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Mittner v. State, 648 So.2d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Murray v. State, 647 So.2d 313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Avallone v. State, 646 So.2d 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Watson v. State, 641 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Macon v. State, 639 So.2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Eckenrode v. State, 638 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Botts v. State, 634 So.2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The requirement that, while on probation, he “work diligently at a lawful occupation” is error. Armstrong v. State, 620 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Davis
630 So. 2d 1059 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Murray v. State
647 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Watson v. State
641 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Eckenrode v. State
638 So. 2d 214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Sweet v. State
644 So. 2d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
MacOn v. State
639 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Avallone v. State
646 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Tibero v. State
646 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Armstrong v. State
620 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Botts v. State
634 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Fyler v. State
645 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
McLeod v. State
645 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Mittner v. State
648 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 So. 2d 699, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 312, 1995 WL 18390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.