Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

659 F.3d 801
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2011
Docket04-16688
StatusPublished

This text of 659 F.3d 801 (Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 659 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

659 F.3d 801 (2011)

Betty DUKES; Patricia Surgeson; Edith Arana; Karen Williamson; Deborah Gunter; Christine Kwapnoski; Cleo Page, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Betty Dukes; Patricia Surgeson; Edith Arana; Karen Williamson; Deborah Gunter; Christine Kwapnoski; Cleo Page, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 04-16688, 04-16720.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 23, 2011.

Debra Gardner, Baltimore, MD, Jocelyn Dion Larkin, Brad Seligman, The Impact Fund, Berkeley, CA, Shauna I. Marshall, Esquire, Hastings College of the Law, Steven Louis Stemerman, Esquire, Elizabeth Ann Lawrence, Esquire, Davis Cowell & Bowe, LLP, Noreen Ann Farrell, Esquire, Arcelia Hurtado, Equal Rights Advocates, San Francisco, CA, Joseph Sellers, Christine E. Webber, Partner, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Washington, DC, Stephen E. Tinkler, Esquire, Tinker & Bennett, Merit Bennett, The Bennett Firm, Santa Fe, NM, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Nancy Lula Abell, Esquire, Paul Grossman, Esquire, Paul Hastings LLP, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Gail Ellen Lees, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Barbara L. Johnson, Neal Mollen, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, Katherine Consuelo Huibonhoa, Paul Hastings LLP, Mark Andrew Perry, Counsel, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, STEPHEN REINHARDT, PAMELA ANN RYMER, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, SUSAN P. GRABER, RAYMOND C. FISHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, MARSHA S. BERZON, CARLOS T. BEA and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We remand to the district court to comply with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 2541, 180 L.Ed.2d 374 (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
131 S. Ct. 2541 (Supreme Court, 2011)
Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
659 F.3d 801 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 F.3d 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukes-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ca9-2011.