Duffy v. Duffy
2 Silv. Ct. App. 459, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 703
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duffy v. Duffy. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 N.Y. 654 →
Opinion
The laches in this case was so great that the court, in the exercise of its discretion, could deny the motion, and for this conclusion the cases of Coit v. Campbell, 82 N. Y. 509; Lyon v. Park, 111 Id. 350 ; 19 N. Y. State Rep. 626, and Matter of Palmer, 115 N. Y. 493; 26 N. Y. State Rep. 338, are ample authorities.
There is, therefore, nothing for us to review, and the appeal should be dismissed, with costs.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duffy v. Duffy, 2 Silv. Ct. App. 459, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 703 (N.Y. 1889).
2 Silv. Ct. App. 459 (Duffy v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coit v. . Campbell, Etc.
82 N.Y. 509 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Matter of Palmer
22 N.E. 221 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)