Duffy v. . Duffy
29 N.E. 141, 130 N.Y. 654, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1306
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duffy v. . Duffy, 29 N.E. 141, 130 N.Y. 654, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1306 (N.Y. 1891).
29 N.E. 141 (Duffy v. . Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kreuger v. Neumann
154 N.E.2d 741 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1958)
State v. Quinnild
42 N.W.2d 409 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)
In re Ford
134 Misc. 310 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)
Standard Oil Co. v. Johnson
299 F. 93 (First Circuit, 1924)
Clark v. Davis
190 N.W. 45 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
People v. Bray
183 P. 712 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Britton v. Washington Water Power Co.
110 P. 20 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Mississippi Central Railroad v. Turnage
49 So. 840 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)
Christopherson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R. R.
109 N.W. 1077 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Logan
70 P. 878 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1902)
Zingrebe v. Union Railway Co.
67 N.Y.S. 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)