Dudley v. State
This text of 758 So. 2d 1209 (Dudley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder. Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of his cocaine use nor when it denied his motions for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial. We affirm his sentence pursuant to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act on the authority of Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), and State v. Wise, 744 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, 741 So.2d 1137 (Fla.1999). We certify that this court’s decision in State v. Wise conflicts with McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
758 So. 2d 1209, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5783, 2000 WL 628282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.