Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
JAMES RICHARD DUDLEY,
Plaintiff,
v. CASE NO. 25-3014-JWL
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff and Kansas prisoner James Richard Dudley brought this now-closed pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It comes now before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint” (Doc. 18), his “Notice to Court” (Doc. 19), and his “Declaration” (Doc. 20), all filed on June 24, 2025. In the motion to amend, Plaintiff asks permission to amend his complaint in order to avoid the three-strikes provision. (Doc. 18, p. 1.) The Court has carefully read all of Plaintiff’s filings and finds that none of them, even liberally construed, provide a persuasive reason to reconsider the dismissal of this matter. Rather, they largely repeat arguments already made or make arguments that Plaintiff previously could have made. As Plaintiff is aware, “[m]aking arguments or asserting facts that could have been previously made or asserted is not enough to succeed on a motion to reconsider.” (Doc. 14, p. 3 (citing Lebahn v. Owens, 813 F.3d 1300, 1306 (10th Cir. 2016), and Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 294 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000)).) The time for Plaintiff to argue that he should have been allowed to proceed in this matter in forma pauperis, to challenge the assessment of strikes against him, to seek relief in this case, or to provide additional arguments on the merits of his claims or the danger he is in has passed. (See Doc. 14, p. 3-5.) The motion will be denied. This case will remain closed. Plaintiff is cautioned that future motions that ask the Court to reconsider the dismissal of this case based on already raised arguments or arguments that could have been raised previously will be summarily denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the motion (Doc. 18) is denied.
This matter shall remain closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated June 25, 2025, in Kansas City, Kansas. S/ John W. Lungstrum JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections (Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.