Duchess v. Langston Corp.
729 A.2d 69
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issue:
Did the Superior Court err in reversing judgment in favor of Petitioner finding that' evidence of a subsequent design change was admissible as a subsequent [70]*70repair as opposed to a subsequent remedial measure?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duchess v. Langston Corp., 729 A.2d 69 (Pa. 1999).
729 A.2d 69 (Duchess v. Langston Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Bil-Jax, Inc.
763 A.2d 920 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)