Duchess v. Langston Corp.
729 A.2d 69, 556 Pa. 435, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1315
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 7, 1999·No. Petition No. 410 W.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7 th day of May, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issue:
Did the Superior Court err in reversing judgment in favor of Petitioner finding that evidence of a subsequent design change was admissible as a subsequent repair as opposed to a subsequent remedial measure?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duchess v. Langston Corp., 729 A.2d 69, 556 Pa. 435, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1315 (Pa. 1999).
729 A.2d 69 (Duchess v. Langston Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Bil-Jax, Inc.
763 A.2d 920 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Phatak v. United Chair Co.
756 A.2d 690 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)