Duc v. Blumenthal

California Supreme Court

Duc v. Blumenthal

11 Cal. 2d 780

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 19, 1938

DocketL. A. No. 16666; L. A. No. 16667; L. A. No. 16668

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cal. 2d 780 (Duc v. Blumenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duc v. Blumenthal, 11 Cal. 2d 780 (Cal. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

These three cases are companion cases to McNeil v. Blumenthal, L. A. No. 16665. (ante, p. 566 [81 Pac. (2d) 567]) this day decided. They are before this court on motion of plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal of defendants from an order of the trial court granting relief pursuant to section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or to affirm the order. The question presented is identical with that determined in the McNeil case. Therefore, on that authority, the respective orders appealed from in these three eases are, and each of them is, hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

These three cases are companion cases to McNeil v. Blumenthal, L. A. No. 16665. (ante, p. 566 [81 Pac. (2d) 567]) this day decided. They are before this court on motion of plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal of defendants from an order of the trial court granting relief pursuant to section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or to affirm the order. The question presented is identical with that determined in the McNeil case. Therefore, on that authority, the respective orders appealed from in these three eases are, and each of them is, hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cal. 2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duc-v-blumenthal-cal-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack