Dubose v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dubose v. State

704 So. 2d 143, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12966, 1997 WL 716057

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 1997

DocketNo. 96-4195

StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 143 (Dubose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dubose v. State, 704 So. 2d 143, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12966, 1997 WL 716057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

BARFIELD, Chief Judge.

The appellant’s conviction for resisting an officer without violence must be REVERSED because the state presented no evidence indicating the appellant was aware that the officer intended to detain him. See Robinson v. State, 667 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); S.G.K. v. State, 657 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Harris v. State, 647 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Nelson v. State, 543 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). His conviction for burglary of a dwelling must also be REVERSED, because a necessary element of that offense as charged in this case was the intent to resist an officer without violence. The ease is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of judgment and sentence for trespass, a lesser included offense indicated in the definition of burglary, regarding which the jury was properly instructed.

KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARFIELD, Chief Judge.

The appellant’s conviction for resisting an officer without violence must be REVERSED because the state presented no evidence indicating the appellant was aware that the officer intended to detain him. See Robinson v. State, 667 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); S.G.K. v. State, 657 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Harris v. State, 647 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Nelson v. State, 543 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). His conviction for burglary of a dwelling must also be REVERSED, because a necessary element of that offense as charged in this case was the intent to resist an officer without violence. The ease is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of judgment and sentence for trespass, a lesser included offense indicated in the definition of burglary, regarding which the jury was properly instructed.

KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 So. 2d 143, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12966, 1997 WL 716057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubose-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack