Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-00990
StatusUnknown

This text of Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company (Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SONY MARISOL ORTEGA DUARTE, Plaintiff, 21-CV-0990 (LLS) -against- ORDER TO AMEND HIGHLAND LIGHT STEAM LAUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant. LOUIS L. STANTON, United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. By order dated February 5, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to either refile her complaint with an English translation or file an amended complaint in English, within sixty days of the date of this order. DISCUSSION Because Plaintiff is proceeding IFP, the Court must screen her complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see also Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998). Plaintiff brings her claims using the Court’s Employment Discrimination Complaint form. She checks the box to indicate that she is asserting claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. In the “facts” section of the complaint form, she writes, “see attached.” (ECF No. 2, at 5.) But the attached statement of facts is written in Spanish, and the Court is therefore unable to review it. Although this Court’s local rules do not prohibit submission of pleadings in a foreign language, “[i]t is clear, to the point of perfect transparency, that federal court proceedings must be conducted in English.” United States v. Rivera-Rosario, 300 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2002); see also United States v. Morales-Madera, 352 F.3d 1, at *7 (1st Cir. 2003) (“The language of the federal courts is English. Participants, including judges, jurors, and counsel, are entitled to understand the proceedings in English.”). Plaintiff is therefore directed to either refile her complaint with an English translation or file an amended complaint in English. See, e.g., Court of Common Pleas v. Kelly, 417 F. App’x 126, 128 (3d Cir. 2011) (holding that where a district court’s local rules do not prohibit

submission of pleadings in a foreign language, such court should request a translation of foreign language pleadings or grant leave to amend the pleadings before taking final action on the foreign language filing). Plaintiff may wish to consider contacting the New York Legal Assistance Group’s (NYLAG) Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York, which is a free legal clinic staffed by attorneys and paralegals to assist those who are representing themselves in civil lawsuits in this Court. The NYLAG clinic can provide translation services. A copy of the flyer with details of the clinic is attached to this order. The clinic is currently only available by telephone.

CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is granted leave to either refile her original complaint, together with an English translation, or file an amended complaint in English. Plaintiff must submit the complaint, with an English translation, or the amended complaint in English, to this Court’s Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, and label the document with docket number 21-CV- 0990 (LLS). An Amended Complaint for Employment Discrimination form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and she cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), for failure to comply with a court order. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 16, 2021 New York, New York LOUIS L. STANTON U.S.D.J.

________________________________________ ________________________________________

________________________________________ (In the space above enter the full name(s) of the plaintiff(s).) AMENDED COMPLAINT -against- FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

________________________________________ Jury Trial: Q Yes Q No ________________________________________ (check one)

________________________________________ ___ Civ. _______ ( ___ ) (In the space above enter the full name(s) of the defendant(s). If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. Typically, the company or organization named in your charge to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be named as a defendant. Addresses should not be included here.) This action is brought for discrimination in employment pursuant to: (check only those that apply) ______ Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as codified, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (race, color, gender, religion, national origin). NOTE: In order to bring suit in federal district court under Title VII, you must first obtain a Notice of Right to Sue Letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

______ Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as codified, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 - 634. NOTE: In order to bring suit in federal district court under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, you must first file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ______ Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as codified, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112 - 12117. NOTE: In order to bring suit in federal district court under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you must first obtain a Notice of Right to Sue Letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

______ New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 to 297 (age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic chacteristics, marital status). ______ New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y. City Admin. Code §§ 8-101 to 131 (actual or perceived age, race, creed, color, national origin, gender, disability, marital status, partnership status, sexual orientation, alienage, citizenship status). I. Parties in this complaint: A. List your name, address and telephone number. Do the same for any additional plaintiffs named. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary. Plaintiff Name ___________________________________________________________________ Street Address ____________________________________________________________ County, City ______________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code __________________________________________________________ Telephone Number ________________________________________________________ B. List all defendants’ names and the address where each defendant may be served. Make sure that the defendant(s) listed below are identical to those contained in the above caption. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary. Defendant Name ___________________________________________________________________ Street Address ____________________________________________________________ County, City ______________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code __________________________________________________________ Telephone Number ________________________________________________________ C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ct of Common Pleas v. Alexandra Kelly
417 F. App'x 126 (Third Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Rivera-Rosario
300 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Morales-Madera
352 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duarte-v-highland-light-steam-laundry-company-nysd-2021.