Dronca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Opinion
We reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which concluded that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under sections 443.036(29) and 443.101(l)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2003). The record shows that [1012] the claimant’s conduct was a single incident of poor judgment, which .justified the employer’s termination of the claimant’s employment, but did not amount to misconduct sufficient to deny the claimant benefits. See Powell v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 886 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); McCarty v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 878 So.2d 432, 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Ash v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 872 So.2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions to award claimant unemployment compensation benefits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
889 So. 2d 1011 (Dronca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.