Dronca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

889 So. 2d 1011, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20233, 2004 WL 3015207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2004·No. No. 1D03-3694·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which concluded that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under sections 443.036(29) and 443.101(l)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2003). The record shows that [1012] the claimant’s conduct was a single incident of poor judgment, which .justified the employer’s termination of the claimant’s employment, but did not amount to misconduct sufficient to deny the claimant benefits. See Powell v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 886 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); McCarty v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 878 So.2d 432, 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Ash v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 872 So.2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions to award claimant unemployment compensation benefits.

ERVIN, PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dronca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 889 So. 2d 1011, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20233, 2004 WL 3015207 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

889 So. 2d 1011 (Dronca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCarty v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
878 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Ash v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
872 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Powell v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
886 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)