Drennan v. Grady
45 N.E. 741, 167 Mass. 415, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 356
Opinion
• There was evidence for the jury that the plaintiff was more than a mere licensee. There was evidence that the water-closet and urinal were provided for the use of the customers of the defendant, and that the plaintiff was a customer. On the evidence, the questions of the due care of the plaintiff and of the negligence of the defendant were rightly left to the jury. Hendricken v. Meadows, 154 Mass. 599.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drennan v. Grady, 45 N.E. 741, 167 Mass. 415, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 356 (Mass. 1897).
45 N.E. 741 (Drennan v. Grady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. August A. Busch Co. of Massachusetts, Inc.
109 N.E.2d 843 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1953)
Ellguth v. Blackstone Hotel, Inc.
92 N.E.2d 502 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1950)
Callaghan v. R. H. White Co.
22 N.E.2d 10 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Liberty Paper Board Co. v. Poe
15 Ohio Law. Abs. 521 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)
Kennedy v. Phillips
5 S.W.2d 33 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
Murphy v. Avery Chemical Co.
133 N.E. 92 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Harvey v. Crane
131 N.E. 168 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
City of Shawnee v. Drake
1918 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
MacK v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.
134 S.W. 846 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Glaser v. Rothschild
120 S.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Calvert v. Springfield Electric Light & Power Co.
83 N.E. 184 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1907)
Wright v. Perry
74 N.E. 328 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Hunnewell v. Haskell
55 N.E. 320 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
John Spry Lumber Co. v. Duggan
54 N.E. 1002 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
John Spry Lumber Co. v. Duggan
80 Ill. App. 394 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)