D.R.C. v. J.A.Z.
994 A.2d 1079
This text of 994 A.2d 1079 (D.R.C. v. J.A.Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.R.C. v. J.A.Z., 994 A.2d 1079 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Does an interpretation of the Domestic Relations Code that requires the Department of Corrections to provide counseling to currently incarcerated felons, including those under a life sentence, so that they may obtain, “custody, partial custody or visitation,” of a minor child produce an absurd result?
(2) Can a custody court order the Department of Corrections to provide and pay for parental-custody-related [1080]*1080counseling for a state inmate when the Department is not a party to the custody proceedings and where no statute directs that it is to assume this cost?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
994 A.2d 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drc-v-jaz-pa-2010.