Drayton v. Cohen

474 F. App'x 991
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2012·No. No. 12-6463·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Selest Drayton appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Drayton’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and deny Drayton’s motion to appoint appellate counsel. Drayton v. Cohen, No. 2:10-cv-03171-TMC, 2012 WL 666839 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drayton v. Cohen, 474 F. App'x 991 (4th Cir. 2012).

474 F. App'x 991 (Drayton v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Nelson
D. South Carolina, 2023
Mathis v. Joyner
E.D. Virginia, 2022
MOORE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2022
Jackson v. Hall
D. South Carolina, 2022
Marin v. Williams
D. South Carolina, 2020
Washington v. Afify
968 F. Supp. 2d 532 (W.D. New York, 2013)