Drawdy Investment Co. v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Florida

Drawdy Investment Co. v. Robinson

108 So. 490, 91 Fla. 669

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Drawdy Investment Co. v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Fla. 397 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 21, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been sub *670 mitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, Ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been sub *670 mitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, Ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Drawdy Investment Co. v. Robinson, 108 So. 490, 91 Fla. 669 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

108 So. 490 (Drawdy Investment Co. v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.