Draper v. Varnerin

107 N.E. 350, 220 Mass. 67, 1914 Mass. LEXIS 1571
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 31, 1914·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Braley, J.

The excavations and changes in grade which the defendant has made in the way, where he had only an easement of passage and the right to make reasonable repairs, having altered to the plaintiff’s injury and damage the way as constructed by her with the consent of the defendant’s predecessor in title, the cross bill was properly dismissed, and the decree restraining any further encroachments and ordering the defendant to restore the way in so far as possible to its original condition should be affirmed with costs. Killion v. Kelley, 120 Mass. 47. Lipsky v. Heller, 199 Mass. 310. Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence [71] Railroad, 202 Mass. 585. Kaatz v. Curtis, 215 Mass. 311. Downey v. H. P. Hood & Sons, 203 Mass. 4, 11. Szathmary v. Boston & Albany Railroad, 214 Mass. 42.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Draper v. Varnerin, 107 N.E. 350, 220 Mass. 67, 1914 Mass. LEXIS 1571 (Mass. 1914).

107 N.E. 350 (Draper v. Varnerin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jasper v. Worcester Spinning & Finishing Co.
64 N.E.2d 89 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Guillet v. Livernois
8 N.E.2d 921 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Cain v. Aspinwall-Delafield Co.
137 A. 610 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Stifel v. Hannan
123 S.E. 673 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1924)