Lipsky v. Heller

85 N.E. 453, 199 Mass. 310, 1908 Mass. LEXIS 825
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 16, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by53 cases

This text of 85 N.E. 453 (Lipsky v. Heller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipsky v. Heller, 85 N.E. 453, 199 Mass. 310, 1908 Mass. LEXIS 825 (Mass. 1908).

Opinion

Braley, J.

By a failure to take exceptions the defendant must be deemed to have accepted the master’s report, and the evidence not having been reported, although the plaintiffs duly excepted, they are concluded by his findings of fact. The respective rights of the parties in the land, therefore, must be determined from the report, upon which also depends the question, whether the decree dismissing the bill should be affirmed, or wholly or partially reversed. Whitworth v. Lowell, 178 Mass. 43. French v. Peters, 177 Mass. 568, 572. East Tennessee Land Co. v. Leeson, 183 Mass. 37. In this inquiry, the plaintiffs having informed the master that they did not desire a finding as to any rights of drainage, he left this question undecided, and it is not open on their exceptions and appeal.

[314]*314

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conway v. Caragliano
Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2023
Carls v. Lexington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
11 Mass. App. Ct. 87 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)
Burroughs v. Milligan
85 A.2d 775 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Cox v. Glenbrook Company
371 P.2d 647 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1962)
Sorel v. Boisjolie
115 N.E.2d 492 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1953)
Anderson v. DeVries
93 N.E.2d 251 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Beaudoin v. Sinodinos
48 N.E.2d 19 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Kolasinski v. Paczkowski
29 N.E.2d 747 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Walker v. E. William & Merrill C. Nutting, Inc..
20 N.E.2d 441 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.
187 N.E. 227 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Novello v. Caprigno
176 N.E. 809 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Casto v. Wrenn
150 N.E. 898 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.
254 Mass. 350 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Salem Terminal Corp.
148 N.E. 444 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Hampe v. Elia
146 N.E. 730 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Levenson v. Ciampa
146 N.E. 681 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Watters v. Blatt
144 N.E. 106 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Dunbar v. Broomfield
142 N.E. 148 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Grennan v. Murray-Miller Co.
138 N.E. 591 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Bacon v. Onset Bay Grove Ass'n
136 N.E. 813 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 N.E. 453, 199 Mass. 310, 1908 Mass. LEXIS 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipsky-v-heller-mass-1908.