Drake v. Line-a-Time Manufacturing Co.
This text of 226 A.D. 717 (Drake v. Line-a-Time Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the witnesses to be examined are without the State of New York (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288), the testimony sought is material, and it cannot be held to be unnecessary simply because plaintiff may have knowledge as to the facts sought to be proved. (Pierce v. Morris, 192 App. Div. 502; McGrath v. Blumenthál, 220 id. 781.) In the interest of convenience plaintiff should give defendant reasonable written notice of time and place of hearing to be had pursuant to the order of this court and the original notice of examination (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 290, 291);
Amd- by Laws of 1923, chap. 205.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-line-a-time-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1929.