Cole v. Manufacturers Trust Co.

253 A.D. 749, 300 N.Y.S. 1194, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5455
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 24, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 253 A.D. 749 (Cole v. Manufacturers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 253 A.D. 749, 300 N.Y.S. 1194, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Order directing plaintiff’s assignor to appear for oral examination in Pasadena, Cal., on the matters specified therein, and requiring plaintiff to pay to the attorneys for the moving defendants the sum of $1,134 for counsel fees and expenses, modified by striking therefrom item 1 and that part of item 2 reading as follows: “ The purchase by Manufacturers Trust Company of said securities at said sales; ” and by striking out the provision requiring plaintiff to pay the $1,134, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Respondents are not entitled to examine plaintiff’s assignor with respect to the matters struck out, because as to them plaintiff has the burden of proof. Where an oral examination outside the State is ordered, the court, in the exercise of discretion, may require either party to pay the expenses of his adversary, but in the absence of unusual circumstances the policy of the courts has been to require the moving party to pay the expenses of the examination. (Drake v. Line-A-Time Mfg. Co., Inc, 226 App. Div. 717; Matter of Interocean Mercantile Corporation, 207 id. 164, 166; Buffalo Gravel Corporation v. Moore, 201 id. 242; MacDonald v. Wills & Co., Ltd., 196 id. 914, 915; Reed v. Fenn, 138 id. 417, 419; Richter v. 44 West 175th Street Corp., 162 Misc. 745, 747.) No reason appears here for departing from this established practice. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Postley
125 Misc. 2d 416 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1984)
Buffone v. Aronson
45 Misc. 2d 454 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Jernberg v. Virtis Co.
17 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Corrao v. Howard Sober, Inc.
11 Misc. 2d 289 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Puma v. Puma
9 Misc. 2d 794 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
In re the Probate of the Will of Russell
9 Misc. 2d 67 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Accounting of Wank
1 A.D.2d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Bator v. Hungarian Commercial Bank of Pest
194 Misc. 232 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 749, 300 N.Y.S. 1194, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-manufacturers-trust-co-nyappdiv-1937.