Dragon v. State
This text of 937 So. 2d 781 (Dragon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert E. DRAGON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert E. Dragon, Avon Park, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence. See Brown v. State, 927 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in Brown, we certify conflict with King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), and Kidd v. State, 855 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
Affirmed.
GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
937 So. 2d 781, 2006 WL 2612740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dragon-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.