Dragon v. State
937 So. 2d 781, 2006 WL 2612740
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 2006·No. 4D06-3196·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Robert E. DRAGON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert E. Dragon, Avon Park, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence. See Brown v. State, 927 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in Brown, we certify conflict with King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), and Kidd v. State, 855 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
Affirmed.
GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dragon v. State, 937 So. 2d 781, 2006 WL 2612740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
937 So. 2d 781 (Dragon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dragon v. State
3 So. 3d 1188 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
Boyer v. State
946 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Breitberg v. State
942 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)