Breitberg v. State
942 So. 2d 439, 2006 WL 3020086
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 2006·No. 4D06-3681·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Murray BREITBERG, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Murray Breitberg, Belle Glade, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dragon v. State, 937 So.2d 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Saintelien v. State, 937 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Brown v. State, 927 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in the above-cited cases, we again certify conflict with King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), and Kidd v. State, 855 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
WARNER, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breitberg v. State, 942 So. 2d 439, 2006 WL 3020086 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
942 So. 2d 439 (Breitberg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Breitberg v. State
14 So. 3d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Breitberg v. State
3 So. 3d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)