Breitberg v. State
This text of 942 So. 2d 439 (Breitberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Murray BREITBERG, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Murray Breitberg, Belle Glade, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dragon v. State, 937 So.2d 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Saintelien v. State, 937 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Brown v. State, 927 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in the above-cited cases, we again certify conflict with King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), and Kidd v. State, 855 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
WARNER, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
942 So. 2d 439, 2006 WL 3020086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breitberg-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.