Doyan v. School District No. 3

35 Vt. 520
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Barrett, J.

The declaration counts- on a contract with the plaintiff to teach a district-school for three months. The alleged defect in the declaration is the want of an averment of having procured the certificate required-by Comp. Stat., chap. 20, sec. 1-2. .That provision provides for an incident, that supervenes upon the contract-, and does not necessarily enter into its terms. [521] If that incident is not shown to have been complied with, the contract becomes void. But this is matter of evidence pertaining to the remedy, and need not be averred in the declaration. It stands upon the same principle as Kent v. Lincoln, 32 Vt. 591, and to cases under the statute of frauds, requiring certain contracts to be in writing.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doyan v. School District No. 3, 35 Vt. 520 (Vt. 1863).

35 Vt. 520 (Doyan v. School District No. 3) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Woodstock v. Town of Hancock
62 Vt. 348 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1890)