DOYAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Georgia

DOYAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. Blair

224 S.E.2d 55, 137 Ga. App. 434, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2473

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 16, 1976

Docket51343

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 224 S.E.2d 55 (DOYAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DOYAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. Blair, 224 S.E.2d 55, 137 Ga. App. 434, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Judge.

We have reviewed the record and the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial judge, and conclude that those findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and are adequate to dispose of the issues raised below. This court will not disturb findings and conclusions that are not "clearly erroneous.” CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). See cases cited in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 133 Ga. App. 613 (2) (211 SE2d 642), reversed on other grounds in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471), vacated in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 135 Ga. App. 337 (217 SE2d 501).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Judge.

We have reviewed the record and the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial judge, and conclude that those findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and are adequate to dispose of the issues raised below. This court will not disturb findings and conclusions that are not "clearly erroneous.” CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). See cases cited in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 133 Ga. App. 613 (2) (211 SE2d 642), reversed on other grounds in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471), vacated in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 135 Ga. App. 337 (217 SE2d 501).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 S.E.2d 55, 137 Ga. App. 434, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyal-development-company-inc-v-blair-gactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack