Downtown Harvard Lunch Club v. Racso, Inc.
199 Misc. 618, 106 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Downtown Harvard Lunch Club v. Racso, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 Misc. 1087 →
Opinion
This motion for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Eules of Civil Practice dismissing the amended complaint as to the defendant Tucci is granted. A director or officer of a corporation may not be held liable where his corporation has been allegedly induced by him to violate its contractual obligation (see Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co., 259 App. Div. 317, and J. E. Brulatour, Inc., v. Wilmer & Vincent Corp., 63 N. Y. S. 2d 54). Settle order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Downtown Harvard Lunch Club v. Racso, Inc., 199 Misc. 618, 106 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2229 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1951).
199 Misc. 618 (Downtown Harvard Lunch Club v. Racso, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance
259 A.D. 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)