Downtown Harvard Lunch Club v. Racso, Inc.
This text of 199 Misc. 618 (Downtown Harvard Lunch Club v. Racso, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This motion for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Eules of Civil Practice dismissing the amended complaint as to the defendant Tucci is granted. A director or officer of a corporation may not be held liable where his corporation has been allegedly induced by him to violate its contractual obligation (see Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co., 259 App. Div. 317, and J. E. Brulatour, Inc., v. Wilmer & Vincent Corp., 63 N. Y. S. 2d 54). Settle order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 Misc. 618, 106 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downtown-harvard-lunch-club-v-racso-inc-nysupct-1951.