Downs v. State
768 So. 2d 1149, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11170, 2000 WL 1234270
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2000
DocketNo. 2D00-1076
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 768 So. 2d 1149 (Downs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Downs v. State, 768 So. 2d 1149, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11170, 2000 WL 1234270 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Ellis D. Downs appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm on the basis of Burgess v. State, 764 So.2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We certify the same question we certified in Burgess, which is:
AFTER THE HOLDING IN CALLA-WAY,1 CAN A TRIAL COURT RELY UPON A SWORN ARREST REPORT IN THE COURT FILE TO DETERMINE, AS A MATTER OF LAW, THAT CONSECUTIVE HABITUAL OFFENDER SENTENCES ARE ILLEGAL? '
Affirmed; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Downs v. State
853 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
768 So. 2d 1149, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11170, 2000 WL 1234270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downs-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.