Downs v. State
768 So. 2d 1149, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11170, 2000 WL 1234270
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2000·No. No. 2D00-1076·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Ellis D. Downs appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm on the basis of Burgess v. State, 764 So.2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We certify the same question we certified in Burgess, which is:
AFTER THE HOLDING IN CALLA-WAY,1 CAN A TRIAL COURT RELY UPON A SWORN ARREST REPORT IN THE COURT FILE TO DETERMINE, AS A MATTER OF LAW, THAT CONSECUTIVE HABITUAL OFFENDER SENTENCES ARE ILLEGAL? '
Affirmed; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Downs v. State, 768 So. 2d 1149, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11170, 2000 WL 1234270 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
768 So. 2d 1149 (Downs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Downs v. State
853 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)