Downs v. State

853 So. 2d 396, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 657, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1405, 2003 WL 21981986
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 21, 2003·No. No. SC00-2382·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, in which the court certified as a question of great public importance the same question certified by that court and answered in Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002). See Downs v. State, 768 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the Second District, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Burgess.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. CANTERO, J., dissents with an opinion, in which WELLS and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downs v. State, 853 So. 2d 396, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 657, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1405, 2003 WL 21981986 (Fla. 2003).

853 So. 2d 396 (Downs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downs v. State
870 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
McCoy v. State
853 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)