Downing v. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co.
This text of 114 So. 666 (Downing v. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the writ of error must be dismissed because the record fails to show a final disposition of the cause in the Circuit Court.
The record discloses that during the progress of the trial, when all evidence had been submitted, the defendant filed a motion for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant. The bill of exceptions contains the following recitation immediately after the motion for an instructed verdict:
“After hearing the arguments upon the above motion of the defendant, the court announced that it would grant the said motion. Thereupon, the plaintiff hearing that the *1097 court would grant said motion asked to take a non-suit and the same was granted. ’ ’
The record fails to show any further disposition of the matter. It contains no judgment of non-suit, nor does it contain any order dismissing the cause.
The mere recitation that “the plaintiff hearing that the court would grant said motion, asked to take a non-suit and the same was granted” contained in the record proper and in the bill of exceptions is not a sufficient order or judgment to constitute the basis for writ of error as contemplated under the provisions of Section 2907, Revised General Statutes of Florida.
The Writ of Error is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 So. 666, 94 Fla. 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-v-weaver-loughridge-lumber-co-fla-1927.