Strong v. City of Winter Park

Supreme Court of Florida

Strong v. City of Winter Park

155 So. 652, 115 Fla. 228, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1491

DecidedJune 9, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 652 (Strong v. City of Winter Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. City of Winter Park, 155 So. 652, 115 Fla. 228, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1491 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A bill of exceptions taken in an action of assumpsit -states that:

“After having heard testimony for Plaintiff counsel for Plaintiff announced ‘Rest.’ Thereupon counsel for defendant moved for a directed verdict for defendant. After argument of counsel the Court indicated he would grant the motion. Whereupon counsel for plaintiff announced that plaintiff elected to take a ‘Non-Suit,’ and asked 90 days to prepare a Bill of Exceptions, and it was so ordered by the Court.”

No judgment appears in the record, therefore the writ of error must be dismissed. Mizell Live Stock Co. v. McCaskill, 57 Fla. 118, 49 So. 501; Dowling v. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co., 94 Fla. 1096, 114 So. 666. As to form of judgment on non-suit, see Spiker v. Hester, 101 Fla. 288, 135 So. 502.

*229 Writ of error dismissed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Teeeell and Bufoed, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI