Downer v. Lent
This text of 6 Cal. 94 (Downer v. Lent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Murray and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
It is beyond controversy, that the power of the Board of Pilot Commissioners is quasi judicial, and they are not civilly answerable. They are public officers to whom the law has entrusted certain duties, the performance of which requires the exercise of judgment. They are unlike a ministerial officer, whose duties are well defined, and who must fail to execute them properly at his own peril.
Whenever, from the necessity of the case, the law is obliged to trust to the sound judgment and discretion of an officer, public policy demands that he should be protected from any consequences of an erroneous judgment.
[96]*96The Court erred in refusing to sustain the demurrer to the declaration; and the judgement is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downer-v-lent-cal-1856.