Downer v. Lent

6 Cal. 94
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by41 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 94 (Downer v. Lent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Downer v. Lent, 6 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

It is beyond controversy, that the power of the Board of Pilot Commissioners is quasi judicial, and they are not civilly answerable. They are public officers to whom the law has entrusted certain duties, the performance of which requires the exercise of judgment. They are unlike a ministerial officer, whose duties are well defined, and who must fail to execute them properly at his own peril.

Whenever, from the necessity of the case, the law is obliged to trust to the sound judgment and discretion of an officer, public policy demands that he should be protected from any consequences of an erroneous judgment.

[96]*96The Court erred in refusing to sustain the demurrer to the declaration; and the judgement is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leon v. County of Riverside
California Supreme Court, 2023
Filarsky v. Delia
Supreme Court, 2012
Moore v. Conliffe
871 P.2d 204 (California Supreme Court, 1994)
Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior Court
551 P.2d 410 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
Hirsch v. Department of Motor Vehicles
42 Cal. App. 3d 252 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
Connelly v. State of California
3 Cal. App. 3d 744 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District
359 P.2d 457 (California Supreme Court, 1961)
Martelli v. Pollock
328 P.2d 795 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Dawson v. Rash
324 P.2d 959 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Hardy v. Vial
311 P.2d 494 (California Supreme Court, 1957)
Caruso v. Abbott
284 P.2d 113 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Wilson v. Sharp
268 P.2d 1062 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Norton v. Hoffmann
93 P.2d 250 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Phelps v. Dawson
97 F.2d 339 (Eighth Circuit, 1938)
White v. Brinkman
73 P.2d 254 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Jones v. Richardson
50 P.2d 810 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Pearson v. Reed
44 P.2d 592 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Kittler v. Kelsch
216 N.W. 898 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Dixon v. City of Reno
187 P. 308 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downer-v-lent-cal-1856.