Dowling v. State
This text of 618 So. 2d 373 (Dowling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have reconsidered this case in light of the Supreme Court’s mandate in Dowling v. State, 605 So.2d 465 (Fla.1992). We affirm based upon Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla.1992).
We are affirming the convictions in this case because the admission of the child hearsay testimony did not rise to the level of reversible error. However, we caution the State that we will continue to scrutinize [374]*374the admission of child hearsay testimony to prevent prosecutorial overkill.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 So. 2d 373, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5856, 1993 WL 174865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowling-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.