Dowling v. State

605 So. 2d 465, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 613, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1710, 1992 WL 275898
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 8, 1992·No. No. 79135·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Dowling v. State, 588 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA1991), a per curiam decision without opinion citing to State v. Pardo, 582 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA1991), quashed in part and approved in part, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla.1992), which was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. See State v. Lofton, 534 So.2d 1148 (Fla.1988); Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).

We recently quashed in part and approved in part the district court decision in Pardo which was relied on below. 596 So.2d at 668. Accordingly, the decision under review is quashed and the cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in Pardo.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling v. State, 605 So. 2d 465, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 613, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1710, 1992 WL 275898 (Fla. 1992).

605 So. 2d 465 (Dowling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dowling v. State
618 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)