Dowling v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
90 N.Y. 670, 1882 N.Y. LEXIS 474
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Tract, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dowling v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., 90 N.Y. 670, 1882 N.Y. LEXIS 474 (N.Y. 1882).
90 N.Y. 670 (Dowling v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunn v. Ruppert
166 A.D. 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
L. E. & W. Railroad v. Mackey
53 Ohio St. (N.S.) 370 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1895)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Sears
2 Ind. App. 654 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1894)
Brown v. City of Syracuse
28 N.Y.S. 792 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Swift v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Co.
3 Silv. Ct. App. 184 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Flynn v. Erie Preserving Co.
12 N.Y. St. Rep. 88 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1887)