Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson

Supreme Court

Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson

539 U.S. 111

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 9, 2003

DocketNo. 02-271

StatusPublished

This text of 539 U.S. 111 (Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson, 539 U.S. 111 (2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

With respect to respondents Joe Isaacson and Phyllis Lisa Isaacson, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U. S. 28 (2002).

With respect to respondents Daniel Raymond Stephenson, Susan Stephenson, Daniel Anthony Stephenson, and Emily Elizabeth Stephenson, the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

With respect to respondents Joe Isaacson and Phyllis Lisa Isaacson, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U. S. 28 (2002).

With respect to respondents Daniel Raymond Stephenson, Susan Stephenson, Daniel Anthony Stephenson, and Emily Elizabeth Stephenson, the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 U.S. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-chemical-co-v-stephenson-scotus-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack