Douze v. State
This text of 945 So. 2d 653 (Douze v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marvin DOUZE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sidney Z. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Through counsel appellant filed a motion to vacate his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l), but the motion was clearly untimely. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm, but our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn motion for postconviction relief in conformance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising the involuntariness issue counsel raised in the motion to vacate. Appellant shall have thirty days from the rendition of this opinion, or shall have the time remaining under Rule 3.850, to file a proper, sworn motion for postconviction relief.
STONE, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
945 So. 2d 653, 2007 WL 57261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douze-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.