Daniels v. State
This text of 974 So. 2d 1131 (Daniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Warren S. DANIELS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Warren S. Daniels, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Juliet S. Fattel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Warren Daniels ("Daniels") appeals the trial court's order denying his post-sentencing pro se motion to withdraw his plea. We affirm.
Daniels filed a motion to withdraw his plea nine months after entering a guilty plea. Daniels claimed his counsel coerced and misadvised him into taking the plea. The record shows that his motion was untimely under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l). McKnight v. State, 964 So.2d 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
Therefore, we affirm, but our affirmance is without prejudice to Daniels filing a sworn motion for post-conviction relief in conformance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Douze v. State, 945 So.2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
974 So. 2d 1131, 2008 WL 313581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.